ALEJANDRO wrote on Jul 5, 2008 6:09 PM:
" I think that this is a great decision for those who support 'first rights' for disenfranchised classes of people. You know, those people with a strange or bizarre lifestyle other than what is normal and traditional.
Pictures and words on one's body may be OK, but we now see that this lifestyle or 'community' also chooses to embrace "exotic piercing, scarification, branding, 3-D art, tooth art, genital piercing and biopsy punches, as well as tattooing."
These ‘body art' seekers have been victims of discrimination in the past, so it is natural that some progressive liberal activists will eventually push for laws to protect ‘bodyarters'.
California will pioneer this too I predict.
And isn't a ‘biopsy punch' a medical procedure anyway?
Will mastectomy (breast removal) be the new art form of personal expression in body art?
It appears that California socially is turning into one big carnival side show, guaranteed to draw customers here to witness the spectacle.
Wait and see, folks, wait and see . . . "
questionable wrote on Jul 5, 2008 9:31 PM:
" I love it how this article was titled "Council okays tattoo business in Lemoore" but yet it ends up talking about a completely different issue. Yes, it does talk about the tattoo shop which I think is awesome, but the whole article isn't about that. You need a new title for this. "
Justice wrote on Jul 11, 2008 11:52 AM:
" I think this type of business should have gotten approval from the citizens of lemoore before it even goes to vote by the city council. These people are well known in fresno for their illegal prectices and drug activity. The citizens of lemoore should be deeply concerned about having this activity going on so close to the high school.
Concerned Lemoore Resident "